Kepastian Hukum dalam Perjanjian Sebagai Fondasi Kepercayaan Publik Terhadap Lembaga Penegak Hukum di Indonesia

Authors

  • Indriati Indriati Universitas Mulia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64367/dialoglegal.v1i3.156

Keywords:

kepastian hukum, perjanjian, litigasi perdata, kepercayaan publik

Abstract

Legal certainty in contracts constitutes a fundamental foundation for safeguarding the rights and obligations of the parties and for strengthening public trust in law enforcement institutions. However, in practice, contract litigation often encounters various obstacles, including the complexity of evidentiary procedures, prolonged case resolution, and difficulties in enforcing court judgments. These conditions influence public perceptions of the integrity and institutional capacity of the judiciary in delivering justice. This study aims to analyze the relationship between legal certainty in contracts and the level of public trust in law enforcement institutions, particularly through public experiences in litigation processes involving breaches of contract. This research employs a qualitative approach using a literature review method that examines relevant academic literature, statutory regulations, and court decisions related to contract law and the effectiveness of the judicial system. The findings indicate that the complexity of evidentiary procedures, extended duration of case resolution, and challenges in enforcing court decisions are key factors shaping public perceptions of judicial effectiveness. An analysis of Decision Number 05/PDT/2020/PT SMR demonstrates that the quality of judicial decisions and the effectiveness of their enforcement are closely linked to the level of public trust in legal authorities. Therefore, improving the quality of judicial reasoning, simplifying procedural mechanisms, and strengthening enforcement processes are essential steps to reinforce legal certainty in contractual relations while enhancing public confidence in Indonesia’s legal system.

Author Biography

Indriati Indriati, Universitas Mulia

Universitas Mulia

References

Awaludin, Agus, Prasetia Randiana, Giovani Anggasta Pratiwi Lambouw, Aep Suhendi, Imas Rosidawati Wiradirja, and Deny Haspada. “Realitas Dan Idealitas Dalam Penegakan Hukum Di Era Kegundahan Politik.” Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum 3, no. 4 (2025): 4212–20.

Azis, Pahrudin, Muhamad Kholid, and Nasrudin Nasrudin. “Perbandingan Lembaga Penyelesaian Sengketa: Litigasi Dan Non-Litigasi.” Qanuniya: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 2 (2024): 11–21.

Daeng, Yusuf, Darma Putri, Baginda S F, and Khevin Rahmat. Keterbatasan Aparat Penegak Hukum Sebagai Hambatan Dalam Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia. 2, no. 2 (2024).

Damanik, Muhammad Irfan Luthfi, and Fauziah Lubis. “Arti Pentingnya Pembuktian Dalam Proses Penemuan Hukum Di Peradilan Perdata.” Judge: Jurnal Hukum 5, no. 02 (2024): 74–81.

Febrianti, Mutiara, and Edi Kristianta Tarigan. “Relevansi Asas Kepastian Hukum Dalam Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Putusan Pidana Menuju Sistem Peradilan Pidana Yang Efektif.” Jurnal Mimbar Ilmu Hukum (MIH) 4, no. 1 (2025): 13–25.

Hartati, Ralang, and Syafrida Syafrida. “Hambatan Dalam Eksekusi Perkara Perdata.” ADIL: Jurnal Hukum 12, no. 1 (2021).

Hijriani, Adinda Nurrizkia, and Nandang Sambas. “Integritas Aparat Penegak Hukum Dan Kepercayaan Publik: Analisis Sosiologi Hukum Di Indonesia (1975).” JOSH: Journal of Sharia 5, no. 01 (2026): 120–32.

Langingi, Sonny, and Rochmad Abu Bakar. “Pengawasan Terhadap Lembaga Negara Independen: Antara Independensi Dan Akuntabilitas.” Lentera: Multidisciplinary Studies 3, no. 4 (2025): 749–66.

Mohamad, Muzakir Syah S., Mutia Cherawaty Thalib, and Nurul Fazri Elfikri. “Kepastian Hukum Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Pelanggaran Perjanjian Lisan Yang Berpotensi Terjadi Pelanggaran Hukum.” RechtJiva, 2035.

Persada, Cakra Wira, and Andy Panroy T. Zulkarnaen. “Reformasi Peradilan Perdata Di Indonesia: Efektivitas Gugatan Sederhana Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa.” Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia 6, no. 4 (2025).

Rahayu, Cantika Tresna, Chelsea Kairadinda Adam, Firda Amalia, and Ni Komang Revalina Senandung Vazkya. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pihak Yang Dirugikan Dalam Wanprestasi.” Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) 2, no. 4 (2024): 138–49.

Saputra, Eko. Peran Penegak Hukum Dalam Sistem Pidana Indonesia. PT Mafy Media Literasi Indonesia, 2025.

Sinaga, Niru Anita. “Implementasi Hak Dan Kewajiban Para Pihak Dalam Hukum Perjanjian.” Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara 10, no. 1 (2019).

Sukadana, Dewa Ayu Putri. “Implikasi Yuridis Wanprestasi Dalam Hukum Perdata Antara Teori Dan Praktik.” Jurnal Rechtens 14, no. 1 (2025): 139–54.

Sulaiman, Sumirahayu, Dwi Anindya Harimurti, Diana Pujiningsih, Bambang Teguh Handoyo, and Muchamad Taufiq. “Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata Melalui Mediasi Di Pengadilan.” Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains 8, no. 2 (2025): 1152–58.

Tamba, Tumanda, and Mukharom Mukharom. “Efektivitas Peran Mediator Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Non Litigasi Dalam Bidang Bisnis Maupun Hukum.” Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbankan Syariah (JIMPA) 3, no. 2 (2023): 445–60.

Yasa, I. Wayan, and Echwan Iriyanto. “Kepastian Hukum Putusan Hakim Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perkara Perdata.” Jurnal Rechtens 12, no. 1 (2023): 33–48.

Yusri. Rekonstruksi Regulasi Pembuktian Dalam Peradilan Perdata Berbasis Pada Nilai Keadilan. 2023.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-30

How to Cite

Indriati, I. (2025). Kepastian Hukum dalam Perjanjian Sebagai Fondasi Kepercayaan Publik Terhadap Lembaga Penegak Hukum di Indonesia . Dialog Legal: Jurnal Syariah, Jurisprudensi Dan Tata Negara, 1(3), 249–257. https://doi.org/10.64367/dialoglegal.v1i3.156

Issue

Section

Articles