Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Proyek Infrastruktur Pendidikan

Kasus Pembangunan Gedung FKIK Universitas Jambi

Authors

  • Putra Yudha Pratama Universitas Terbuka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64367/dialoglegal.v1i3.111

Keywords:

Corporate Criminal Liability, Corruption Crimes, Education Infrastructure Projects

Abstract

Corruption Crimes (Tipikor) involving corporations in educational infrastructure projects are a serious threat to the quality of national development. This study aims to analyze and identify the corporate criminal liability model applied by judges in the corruption case of the construction of the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences (FKIK) University of Jambi (Unja) Building, as well as to test the effectiveness of additional criminal sanctions imposed. This normative-empirical legal research uses a case study approach to the Jambi Corruption Court Decision. Primary data in the form of decisions were analyzed qualitatively, supported by a study of the corporate criminal law literature. The results of the study show that the panel of judges tends to use the Identification Doctrine by applying the principle of "criminal for administrators is criminal for corporations", but began to adopt a strict liability model in accordance with Perma No. 13 of 2016. Additional criminal sanctions in the form of compensation and fines are considered not fully effective in restoring state losses and providing a deterrent effect, so it requires optimizing the application of administrative sanctions and revocation of business licenses.

Author Biography

Putra Yudha Pratama, Universitas Terbuka

Universitas Terbuka

References

Hamzah, Andi. 2020. Hukum Pidana Indonesia Edisi Terbaru. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Lamintang, P.A.F. 2022. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. Bandung: Sinar Baru.

Muladi dan Barda Nawawi Arief. 2021. Teori-Teori dan Kebijakan Pidana. Bandung: Alumni.

Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 13 Tahun 2016 tentang Tata Cara Penanganan Perkara Tindak Pidana oleh Korporasi.

Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 jo. Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.

Luthfi, M. (2020). Reformulasi Ketentuan Pidana Mati Korporasi pada Tindak Pidana Korupsi yang Bersifat Berkelanjutan. Lex Jurnalica, 17(2), 150-165.

Marzuki, P. M. (2023). Kedudukan Mens Rea Korporasi dalam Perkembangan Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 12(1), 1-18.

Puspitasari, I. (2024). Analisis Yuridis Penerapan Controlling Mind Doctrine dalam Putusan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Korporasi. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 4(2), 110-125.

Rahman, A., & Sari, D. P. (2023). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi di Pengadilan Tipikor Jambi (Studi Kasus Proyek X). Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jambura, 10(1), 15-30.

Santoso, T., & Purwoko, H. (2022). Dampak Korupsi Proyek Universitas terhadap Kerugian Negara dan Sanksi Hukumnya. Jurnal Hukum Pidana Indonesia, 9(3), 400-415.

Siregar, A. H. (2020). Pengembalian Aset Negara dari Kejahatan Korporasi Melalui Penerapan Sanksi Uang Pengganti. Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 11(1), 50-65.

Widodo, B. (2021). Kebijakan Kriminalisasi terhadap Korporasi dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan Ekonomi. Jurnal Hukum Modern, 16(2), 200-215.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-30

How to Cite

Pratama, P. Y. (2025). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Proyek Infrastruktur Pendidikan: Kasus Pembangunan Gedung FKIK Universitas Jambi. Dialog Legal: Jurnal Syariah, Jurisprudensi Dan Tata Negara, 1(3), 216–223. https://doi.org/10.64367/dialoglegal.v1i3.111

Issue

Section

Articles